Abstract
To reduce variation in manufacturing processes, traditional statistical process control (SPC) techniques can be applied to monitor automatic process control (APC) controlled processes for detecting assignable cause process variation. In this paper we compare the monitoring of process output and the monitoring of the control action of Minimum-Mean-Squared-Error- and Proportional-Integral-Controlled processes. We show that the robustness property of the PI controller makes it difficult to detect unanticipated mean shifts when the process output is being monitored. We illustrate how the signal-to-noise ratios developed in Jiang, Tsui, and Woodall (2000) can be used to predict the SPC chart performance and help select the appropriate chart for monitoring.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 384-398 |
| Journal | Journal of Quality Technology |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Research Keywords
- Autoregressive moving average process
- Quality control
- Statistical process control
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'SPC monitoring of MMSE- and PI-controlled processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver