Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Spatial stimulus response compatibility for a horizontal visual display with hand and foot controls

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this study, two experiments were conducted to examine spatial stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effects for a horizontal visual display with hand and foot controls. In experiment 1, the hand and foot controls were in a hands above and feet below vertical plane, such that the display and controls were orthogonal to each other. In experiment 2, the foot pedals were moved forward and placed directly underneath the front row of signals, resulting in an additional horizontal display and control relationship. The results of experiment 1 revealed a strong orthogonal SRC effect, such that the best performance was for the front signals with hand controls and rear signals with foot pedals, which was not altered with the presence of horizontal location mappings in experiment 2. These findings indicate that the front-hand/rear-foot mapping relationship was quite robust with regard to changes in the relative locations of the hand and foot response devices. Statement of Relevance: The results of this study provide useful ergonomics recommendations for designing control consoles with visual signals presented in a horizontal plane and control devices operated by hands and feet. They are helpful for improving efficiency and overall system performance in person-machine systems. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)233-245
    JournalErgonomics
    Volume54
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

    Research Keywords

    • Foot control
    • Hand control
    • Spatial compatibility
    • Visual signal

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial stimulus response compatibility for a horizontal visual display with hand and foot controls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this