Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Some refinements on peer assessment of group projects

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    As the demand for group projects in higher education has increased in recent years, it is necessary to device an assessment method that results in fair grading of project group members. An attempt has been made to apply an existing peer assessment approach from Goldfinch to engineering student group projects. The results confirm the validity of the approach. However, the existing approach has a number of problems owing to the inevitable bias introduced by individual students during the peer assessment process. A new normalisation process is introduced to iron out the inherent shortcomings of the existing peer assessment method. The experience gained so far has led us to believe that this peer assessment method with normalisation can be used as a tool to assess individual marks of a group project. © 2001 Taylor & Francis Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)5-18
    JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
    Volume26
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Some refinements on peer assessment of group projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this