Abstract
Any complete theory of speaking must take the dialogical function of language use into account. Pickering & Garrod (P&G) make some progress on this point. However, we question whether their interactive alignment model is the optimal approach. In this commentary, we specifically criticize (1) their notion of alignment being implemented through priming, and (2) their claim that self-monitoring can occur at all levels of linguistic representation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 208-209 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Some notes on priming, alignment, and self-monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver