TY - JOUR
T1 - Some New Haven international law reflections on China, India and their various territorial disputes
AU - Carty, Anthony
AU - Lone, Fozia Nazir
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - These territorial disputes illustrate that although both in India and China the 'unequal treaties' and 'international law as imperialism' debate fueled anticolonial and nationalist sentiments, yet the two persistently adopted a purely western style territorial sovereignty claim to superior title to the territories in question. The Indian decision making conservatism is led by an authoritarian state culture. Whereas for China, its repeated references to historical claims appears to be a harking back to its own imperial past, when the other states were in a relationship of vassalage to it. The western principles with a shallow eastern sugarcoating of non-interference, non-aggression, equality and mutual benefit and peaceful co-existence are a form of Eastphalia. Hence, in China and India, international law and diplomacy are guided by a formalist dualism. This article proposes a New Haven observational perspective on India and China which points the way to a reconfiguration of the normative issues raised by their territorial disputes. © LexisNexis, 2011.
AB - These territorial disputes illustrate that although both in India and China the 'unequal treaties' and 'international law as imperialism' debate fueled anticolonial and nationalist sentiments, yet the two persistently adopted a purely western style territorial sovereignty claim to superior title to the territories in question. The Indian decision making conservatism is led by an authoritarian state culture. Whereas for China, its repeated references to historical claims appears to be a harking back to its own imperial past, when the other states were in a relationship of vassalage to it. The western principles with a shallow eastern sugarcoating of non-interference, non-aggression, equality and mutual benefit and peaceful co-existence are a form of Eastphalia. Hence, in China and India, international law and diplomacy are guided by a formalist dualism. This article proposes a New Haven observational perspective on India and China which points the way to a reconfiguration of the normative issues raised by their territorial disputes. © LexisNexis, 2011.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960031958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79960031958&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1080/10192557.2011.11788243
DO - 10.1080/10192557.2011.11788243
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1019-2557
VL - 19
SP - 93
EP - 111
JO - Asia Pacific Law Review
JF - Asia Pacific Law Review
IS - 1
ER -