Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Some issues on verbal reciprocals in Malagasy

  • Paul Law

Research output: Working PapersWorking paper

Abstract

This paper claims that there is but one morphological realization of reciprocals in Malagasy. It clarifies Keenan & Razafimamonji’s (2004) arguments against the syntactic analysis of the reciprocal morpheme if-. It shows that most of them are in fact quite compatible with the syntactic treatment of if-. It nevertheless argues that certain facts about comparative ellipsis cannot be accounted for by the syntactic account, but can be explained by their view that if- is derived from an affixation rule. Split plural argument, however, remains problematic for both views.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationWellington, New Zealand
PublisherVictoria University of Wellington
Pages115-127
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameWellington Working Papers in Linguistics
Volume23
ISSN (Print)1170-1978
ISSN (Electronic)2230-4681

Bibliographical note

Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Some issues on verbal reciprocals in Malagasy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this