Social distancing and workplace relationships in South Korea : exploring changes in negative and positive affective exchanges at work before and during COVID-19

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

1 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-105
Journal / PublicationHuman Resource Development International
Volume27
Issue number1
Online published28 May 2023
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Abstract

Many organisations introduced social distancing to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. However, since social distancing is designed to reduce personal interactions, it can impact workplace relationships. This paper explores how and when social distancing influences workplace relationships. Drawing on the affect theory of social exchange and the social cognition literature, we argue that when employees have more negative affective relationships with their co-workers (before COVID-19), social distancing helps improve such negative affective relationships (during COVID-19), especially when the co-worker is warm and competent. We collected data on relationships that individual employees in South Korea have with their co-workers before and during COVID-19. Our hierarchical linear modelling results show that social distancing indeed reduces the negative affective relationships that employees have with their co-workers when those co-workers are viewed as warm and competent. Conversely, social distancing does not hurt employees’ positive affective relationships. These findings suggest that contrary to view that social distancing and remote work causes misunderstanding and conflict, social distancing helps to improve employees’ workplace relationships. We therefore draw implications for human resource development professionals in facilitating high-quality relationships in remote settings. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Research Area(s)

  • social distancing, COVID-19, workplace relationships, warmth, competence, negative affective relationships

Citation Format(s)