Social comparison among competing firms

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalNot applicablepeer-review

26 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

  • Kwang-Ho Kim
  • Wenpin Tsai

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-136
Journal / PublicationStrategic Management Journal
Volume33
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

Abstract

Extending social comparison theory to the context of interfirm competition, we investigate whether and under what conditions firms may benefit by deviating from consumers' views concerning firm comparisons. Based on all of the possible dyadic competitive comparisons among the 26 automakers in the United States, we found that: (1) a focal firm enjoys a greater increase in sales than the target firm when it compares itself with a more reputable target firm, even though consumers do not perceive the focal firm to be comparable to the more reputable firm; and (2) a focal firm enjoys a greater increase in sales than the target firm when it avoids comparison with a less reputable target firm, even though consumers compare the focal firm with the less reputable firm. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Research Area(s)

  • basking in reflected glory, competitive action, competitor analysis, cutting off reflected failure, social comparison

Citation Format(s)

Social comparison among competing firms. / Kim, Kwang-Ho; Tsai, Wenpin.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 115-136.

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalNot applicablepeer-review