Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Site-specific assessments of environmental risk and natural resource damage based on great horned owls

  • Matthew J. Zwiernik
  • , Karl D. Strause
  • , Denise P. Kay
  • , Alan L. Blankenship
  • , John P. Giesy

    Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

    Abstract

    Selection of receptors is a key element of ecological risk and natural resource damage assessments. The great horned owl (Bubo virginianus; GHO) has advantages as a tertiary terrestrial receptor and integrated measure of exposure to chemical residues in a multiple-lines-of-evidence approach that includes elucidation of contaminant exposure by measured (tissue-based) and predicted (dietary) methodologies, and population-level measures of potential adverse effects (i.e., productivity, abundance). Methods described herein exploited attributes of GHO behavior, including its propensity to nest in artificial nesting platforms. This approach allowed better control of experimental conditions, minimized uncertainty in assessment endpoints, and maximized data utility for testing hypotheses. During 5 years, 54 GHO nests (14 active territories) along 38 km of river floodplain were monitored at the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site (Kalamazoo/Allegan Counties, Michigan). Concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and otho-, para-substituted isomers of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), including DDD/DDE (Σ DDTs), were measured in 24 eggs and 16 samples of nestling blood plasma. Dietary PCB exposure was predicted by determining site-specific dietary composition and sampling and quantifying PCB concentrations in 171 prey items collected within active GHO territories. The convergence of exposure and effects assessments improved confidence in resulting predictions of minimal risk to resident GHO populations (Hazard Quotients ≤1.5). Repeated GHO use of nesting platforms minimized temporal and spatial variability. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)966-985
    JournalHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment
    Volume13
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2007

    Bibliographical note

    Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

    Funding

    The authors thank the students and staff of the Michigan State University Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, including Paul Jones, Dan Villeneuve, Patrick Bradley, Pam Moseley, William Claflin, Donna Pieracini, Ryan Holem, and Scott Kissman as well as personnel of the Michigan State University Veterinary Clinic, including Jim Sikarskie, Simon Hollemby, and Heather Simmons, personnel of the Michigan State University, Kellogg Biological Station, most notably Nina Consolotti, Joe Johnson, and Michael Klug. We also recognize the assistance provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, East Lansing Field Office, most notably Lisa Williams, Dave Best, and Charles Mehne as well as the staff of the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources at Fort Custer and the Allegan State Game Area including William Kosmider, John Lerg, and Mike Baily. We thank Ray Adams of the Kalamazoo Nature Center. Funding for this project was provided by the Kalamazoo River Study Group through an unrestricted research grant to J. P. Giesy (PI) of Michigan State University.

    Research Keywords

    • ERA
    • Exposure assessment
    • Great horned owl
    • Multiple-lines-of-evidence
    • Raptor
    • Receptor

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Site-specific assessments of environmental risk and natural resource damage based on great horned owls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this