Silico-aluminophosphate and alkali-aluminosilicate geopolymers: A comparative review

Yan-Shuai Wang, Yazan Alrefaei, Jian-Guo Dai*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

18 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Chemically activated materials (often termed as geopolymer) have received attracting attentions in civil, material and environmental research fields as a toolkit alternative to traditional Portland cement in specific applications. This paper presents a comparative review on silico-aluminophosphate (SAP) geopolymers in terms of definition, chemistries involved during geopolymerization, mechanical performance, durability, environmental impacts, and their potentials in applications relative to conventional alkali-aluminosilicate (AAS) geopolymers. Recommendations for future applications are also highlighted. It is found that S-A-P gels with six-coordinated aluminum environment dominate in SAP geopolymers, while the aluminum in N-A-S-H gels formed in the AAS geopolymers is characterized by four-coordinated features. Besides, the slow performance development of SAP geopolymer matrix under ambient temperature curing can be compensated through incorporating additional countermeasures (e.g., metal sources) which allow the tailored design of such geopolymers for certain in-situ applications. Generally, the calcium-bearing C-(A)-S-H gels co-existing with N-A-S-H gels are dominant in AAS geopolymers, while the S-A-P gels enhanced by phosphate-containing crystalline/amorphous phases are the main products in SAP geopolymers. The SAP geopolymers show their environmental friendliness relative to the AAS geopolymers due to the utilization of phosphate activators that require lower production energy relative to silicate-containing activators. However, the higher cost of phosphate activators may confine the applications of SAP geopolymers in some exquisite or special fields. © 2019 Wang, Alrefaei and Dai. © 2019 Wang, Alrefaei and Dai.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106
JournalFrontiers in Materials
Volume6
Online published7 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the Hong Kong-Guangzhou Technology and Innovation Partnership Program (Project No. 201807010055), National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Projects No. 51638008 and 51478406), HKSAR Innovation Technology Fund (Project code: ITS/009/17) and the Hong Kong Ph.D. Fellowship Scheme (HKPFS) awarded to the second author. The authors would also like to thank Prof. John L. Provis for his advice toward the paper during the study visit of the first author at the University of Sheffield.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Research Keywords

  • Alkali-aluminosilicate
  • Environmental impacts
  • Geopolymerization mechanism
  • Silico-aluminophosphate
  • Sustainable development

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Silico-aluminophosphate and alkali-aluminosilicate geopolymers: A comparative review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this