Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should Listed Companies Be Allowed to Adopt Dual-Class Share Structure in Hong Kong?

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

The request of Alibaba, China's largest e-commerce firm, to allow a self-selected group of its past and present management known as the ‘partners' the right to nominate a majority of the directors in its negotiation with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange for an initial public offering has reignited a new round of debate over the one share, one vote policy, which has survived for 27 years in Hong Kong. This paper discusses the viability of allowing the dual-class share structure in the city. Although the United States has adopted dual-class share structures for decades, this paper identifies the major institutional differences between Hong Kong and the United States and argues that Hong Kong should not follow suit due to these differences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-182
JournalCommon Law World Review
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • dual-class share
  • shareholders' voting rights
  • stock exchange
  • Hong Kong
  • United States
  • Singapore

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should Listed Companies Be Allowed to Adopt Dual-Class Share Structure in Hong Kong?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this