Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Serial agile production systems with automation

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

To gain insights into the design and control of manufacturing cells with automation, we study simple models of serial production systems where one flexible worker attends a set of automated stations. We (a) characterize the operational benefits of automation, (b) determine the most desirable placement of automation within a line, and (c) investigate how best to allocate labor dynamically in a line with manual and automatic equipment. We do this by first considering two-station Markov decision process models and then studying three-station simulations. Our results show that the capacity of production lines with automatic machines can be significantly lower than the rate of the bottleneck. We also show that automating a manual machine can have a dramatic effect on the average work-in-process (WIP) level, provided that labor is the system bottleneck. Once a machine becomes the bottleneck, the benefits from further automation are dramatically reduced. In general, we find that automation is more effective when placed toward the end of the line rather than toward the front. Finally, we show that automation level increases the priority workers should give to a station when selecting a work location. © 2005 INFORMS.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)852-866
JournalOperations Research
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2005
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Research Keywords

  • Automation
  • Capacity
  • Cross-trained workers
  • Markov decision process
  • Serial line

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Serial agile production systems with automation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this