Self-transformation and civil society: Lockean vs. Confucian

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Although contemporary Confucianists tend to view Western liberalism as pitting the individual against society, recent liberal scholarship has vigorously claimed that liberal polity is indeed grounded in the self-transformation that produces "liberal virtues." To meet this challenge, this essay presents a sophisticated Confucian critique of liberalism by arguing that there is an appreciable contrast between liberal and Confucian self-transformation and between liberal and Confucian virtues. By contrasting Locke and Confucius, key representatives of each tradition, this essay shows that both liberalism and Confucianism aim to reconstruct a society freed from antisocial passions entailing a vicious politics of resentment, and yet come to differing ethical and political resolutions. My key claim is that what makes Confucian self-cultivation so distinctive is the incorporation of ritual propriety (li) within it, whereas liberal self-transformation that relies heavily on a method of self-control comes back to the problem that it originally set out to overcome. © Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)383-401
    JournalDao
    Volume8
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

    Research Keywords

    • Civil society
    • Confucius
    • Li
    • Locke
    • Self-control
    • Self-transformation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Self-transformation and civil society: Lockean vs. Confucian'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this