Abstract
Evacuated-tube (ET) solar water heaters are popular in China. Both single-phase and two-phase thermosyphon ET collector systems are available in the market. However, the system energy and economic performance has not been evaluated systematically. In this paper, the numerical evaluation of these two types of solar water heaters in different climate zones of China was reported on the aspects of system energy performance and economical return. The single-phase system is found having better cost payback period in all these cities, and can be a suitable choice except for locations with extreme cold weather. The two-phase design is an attractive and sustainable alternative since its thermal efficiency is higher under the same weather condition and this is important for supporting zero-carbon building design. On the other hand, it can be readily used to enhance the outside appearance of a building. Hence when considering climate adaptability and aesthetic compatibility, the potential of the two-phase system is higher. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 265-274 |
| Journal | Solar Energy |
| Volume | 98 |
| Issue number | PC |
| Online published | 7 Nov 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Research Keywords
- Economic payback period
- Evacuated-tube collector
- Solar water heating
- Thermosyphon system
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Selection between single-phase and two-phase evacuated-tube solar water heaters in different climate zones of China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver