Ruling Before the Law : The Politics of Legal Regimes in China and Indonesia
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 62 - Review of books or of software (or similar publications/items) › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 672-673 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal / Publication | Perspectives on Politics |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 2 |
Online published | 21 May 2021 |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2021 |
Link(s)
DOI | DOI |
---|---|
Permanent Link | https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(bb5de2c3-8e93-4abd-b148-cc4f10012b99).html |
Abstract
William Hurst’s Ruling before the Law adds to the long list of books on comparative studies of Asian legal systems and is probably the first that compares the People’s Republic of China (China or PRC) and Indonesia. The author believes that a comparison between these two very different countries is meaningful because they both have young legal systems in societies with vast regional differences and sharp distinctions between rural and urban areas, and both started in a context of low incomes and poverty. Applying the concept of legal regimes to the two jurisdictions, the book aims to bring a new perspective to the study of law and society and judicial politics, with renewed micro and empirical emphasis on grassroots institutions and activities that are compared not only between the two countries but also within each country.
Research Area(s)
- Rule of law, China, Indonesia, Legal regimes
Bibliographic Note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.
Citation Format(s)
Ruling Before the Law: The Politics of Legal Regimes in China and Indonesia. / Wang, Jiangyu.
In: Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 06.2021, p. 672-673.
In: Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 06.2021, p. 672-673.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 62 - Review of books or of software (or similar publications/items) › peer-review