TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk-informed adaptive sampling strategy for liquefaction severity mapping
AU - Guan, Zhen
AU - Wang, Yu
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - In engineering practice, liquefaction severity map is usually developed from liquefaction potential index (LPI) which is estimated using in-situ tests, such as cone penetration tests (CPTs). To efficiently perform in-situ tests for obtaining a reliable liquefaction severity map, it is advantageous to use adaptive sampling strategy, which uses results from initial measurements to sequentially decide CPT number and locations in a later stage. For example, the optimal number and locations of subsequent CPTs may be determined for maximising the reduction of overall uncertainty in the interpolated LPI data over the map obtained from a preliminary stage. However, uncertainty-based adaptive sampling might not provide optimal results for liquefaction severity mapping because the threshold of liquefaction severity classification is not considered. To properly evaluate the reliability of interpreted liquefaction severity map, a reliability index, β, is proposed in this study and further used to determine the optimal number and locations of in-situ tests. The proposed risk-informed adaptive sampling strategy is illustrated and compared with the uncertainty-based strategy. The example shows that the proposed method is more efficient than the uncertainty-based strategy. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
AB - In engineering practice, liquefaction severity map is usually developed from liquefaction potential index (LPI) which is estimated using in-situ tests, such as cone penetration tests (CPTs). To efficiently perform in-situ tests for obtaining a reliable liquefaction severity map, it is advantageous to use adaptive sampling strategy, which uses results from initial measurements to sequentially decide CPT number and locations in a later stage. For example, the optimal number and locations of subsequent CPTs may be determined for maximising the reduction of overall uncertainty in the interpolated LPI data over the map obtained from a preliminary stage. However, uncertainty-based adaptive sampling might not provide optimal results for liquefaction severity mapping because the threshold of liquefaction severity classification is not considered. To properly evaluate the reliability of interpreted liquefaction severity map, a reliability index, β, is proposed in this study and further used to determine the optimal number and locations of in-situ tests. The proposed risk-informed adaptive sampling strategy is illustrated and compared with the uncertainty-based strategy. The example shows that the proposed method is more efficient than the uncertainty-based strategy. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
KW - Liquefaction severity map
KW - Adaptive sampling
KW - Reliability index
KW - Uncertainty-based sampling
KW - Risk-informed sampling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162867028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85162867028&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1080/17499518.2023.2225165
DO - 10.1080/17499518.2023.2225165
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1749-9518
VL - 18
SP - 526
EP - 539
JO - Georisk
JF - Georisk
IS - 2
ER -