Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rethinking Trust in Construction Contract Formation: Dispute Resolution Method Selection

  • Ghada M. Gad
  • , Jennifer S. Shane
  • , Kelly C. Strong
  • , Jinouk Choi*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

Low trust negatively affects the efficiency, schedule performance, and administrative cost functions of construction project team. However, trust is seldom taken into consideration during contract formation; in particular, in the dispute resolution method (DRM) clauses. The objective of this paper is to investigate how trust influences contract terms and conditions related to the DRM clauses. Data from 27 construction projects were collected and 11 DRM experts participated in the study. The results show that although experts recommend the choice of DRMs based on the trust level between parties, the DRM actually used on construction projects is not affected by the trust level between partners. Negotiation was the most recommended DRM for high-trust projects, but was the least used DRM in practice on such projects. The conclusion of this research is an incremental step to rethink social factors that are overlooked in construction management and that proved influential on how contracts are drafted.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberUNSP 04516003
JournalJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume8
Issue number3
Online published1 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Trust in Construction Contract Formation: Dispute Resolution Method Selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this