Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Responding to the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Tale of Two Cities

  • Shi-Hong Weng
  • , Anna Ya Ni
  • , Alfred Tat-Kei Ho*
  • , Ruo-Xi Zhong
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

This study compares the experiences of Shanghai in China and Los Angeles in the United States to illustrate four tension points in pandemic responses: immediacy versus thoroughness, transparency versus secrecy and security, centralization versus decentralization, and state-driven solutions versus coproduction. Based on the case analysis, strategic management and planning practices in six stages of pandemic response are recommended. The study also suggests research questions for future comparative research to examine more carefully how pandemic responses should vary due to institutional differences and local contextualization and adaptation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-504
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume50
Issue number6-7
Online published17 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Keywords

  • comparative public management
  • COVID-19
  • emergency management
  • pandemic response
  • public governance

Policy Impact

  • Cited in Policy Documents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responding to the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Tale of Two Cities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this