Responding to the Coronavirus Pandemic : A Tale of Two Cities
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 497-504 |
Journal / Publication | American Review of Public Administration |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 6-7 |
Online published | 17 Jul 2020 |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
This study compares the experiences of Shanghai in China and Los Angeles in the United States to illustrate four tension points in pandemic responses: immediacy versus thoroughness, transparency versus secrecy and security, centralization versus decentralization, and state-driven solutions versus coproduction. Based on the case analysis, strategic management and planning practices in six stages of pandemic response are recommended. The study also suggests research questions for future comparative research to examine more carefully how pandemic responses should vary due to institutional differences and local contextualization and adaptation.
Research Area(s)
- comparative public management, COVID-19, emergency management, pandemic response, public governance
Citation Format(s)
Responding to the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Tale of Two Cities. / Weng, Shi-Hong; Ni, Anna Ya; Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei et al.
In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 50, No. 6-7, 08.2020, p. 497-504.
In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 50, No. 6-7, 08.2020, p. 497-504.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review