Research on Street-Level Discretion in the West: Past, Present, and the Future

Xiaowei Zang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lipsky's Street-Level Bureaucracy (1980) led to a major paradigm shift in the study of public administration and bureaucracy. It identified discretion by frontline workers as a critical issue in the study of street-level bureaucracy. Chinese scholars have since 2000 joined research on street-level bureaucracy. Some reviews of the English literature on street-level bureaucracy have been published in China. This paper discusses some major issues in research on street-level discretion in the West, drawing on Hupe and Buffat (Public Manag Rev 16(4):548-569, 2014); Maynard-Moody and Portillo (The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 255-277, 2010); Portillo and Rudes (Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 10:321-334, 2014). Compared with the Chinese reviews noted above, this paper is a more substantial and updated summary and assessment of the literature on street-level discretion. It also raises some issues for future research on frontline discretion in China.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)610-622
JournalCHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume1
Issue number4
Online published31 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Research Keywords

  • Lipsky
  • Street-level bureaucracy
  • Discretion
  • Frontline work
  • Policy implementation
  • BUREAUCRATS
  • ACCOUNTABILITY
  • ENFORCEMENT
  • FRONTLINE
  • REFORM
  • CONSTRUCTION
  • ORGANIZATION
  • GOVERNANCE
  • COMMUNITY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Research on Street-Level Discretion in the West: Past, Present, and the Future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this