Abstract
Lipsky's Street-Level Bureaucracy (1980) led to a major paradigm shift in the study of public administration and bureaucracy. It identified discretion by frontline workers as a critical issue in the study of street-level bureaucracy. Chinese scholars have since 2000 joined research on street-level bureaucracy. Some reviews of the English literature on street-level bureaucracy have been published in China. This paper discusses some major issues in research on street-level discretion in the West, drawing on Hupe and Buffat (Public Manag Rev 16(4):548-569, 2014); Maynard-Moody and Portillo (The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 255-277, 2010); Portillo and Rudes (Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 10:321-334, 2014). Compared with the Chinese reviews noted above, this paper is a more substantial and updated summary and assessment of the literature on street-level discretion. It also raises some issues for future research on frontline discretion in China.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 610-622 |
| Journal | CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Online published | 31 Aug 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2016 |
Research Keywords
- Lipsky
- Street-level bureaucracy
- Discretion
- Frontline work
- Policy implementation
- BUREAUCRATS
- ACCOUNTABILITY
- ENFORCEMENT
- FRONTLINE
- REFORM
- CONSTRUCTION
- ORGANIZATION
- GOVERNANCE
- COMMUNITY