Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reputation Concerns of Independent Directors: Evidence from Individual Director Voting

  • Wei Jiang*
  • , Hualin Wan
  • , Shan Zhao
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the voting behavior of independent directors of public companies in China from 2004-2012. The unique data at the individual-director level overcome endogeneity in both board formation and proposal selection by allowing analysis based on within-board proposal variation. Career-conscious directors, measured by age and the director's reputation value, are more likely to dissent; dissension is eventually rewarded in the marketplace in the form of more outside directorships and a lower risk of regulatory sanctions. Director dissension improves corporate governance and market transparency primarily through the responses of stakeholders (shareholders, creditors, and regulators), to whom dissension disseminates information.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-696
JournalReview of Financial Studies
Volume29
Issue number3
Online published3 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Policy Impact

  • Cited in Policy Documents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reputation Concerns of Independent Directors: Evidence from Individual Director Voting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this