Abstract
This study examines the voting behavior of independent directors of public companies in China from 2004-2012. The unique data at the individual-director level overcome endogeneity in both board formation and proposal selection by allowing analysis based on within-board proposal variation. Career-conscious directors, measured by age and the director's reputation value, are more likely to dissent; dissension is eventually rewarded in the marketplace in the form of more outside directorships and a lower risk of regulatory sanctions. Director dissension improves corporate governance and market transparency primarily through the responses of stakeholders (shareholders, creditors, and regulators), to whom dissension disseminates information.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 655-696 |
| Journal | Review of Financial Studies |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Online published | 3 Dec 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reputation Concerns of Independent Directors: Evidence from Individual Director Voting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver