Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Remedies for employment termination in Australia: A case of one door closing and another opening?

  • Rohan Price

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

The eligibility of an employee to take legal action when his or her employment ends has become crucial to understanding the strengths and limitations of each Australian federal action because it determines both the jurisdiction of a court or tribunal to test the liability of an employer and its power to order a remedy. The legal options open to an Australian employee when his or her employment comes to an end are currently in a period of rationalisation. As unfair termination becomes increasingly unavailable to employees due to jurisdictional changes, employment discrimination is poised to become a more significant cause of action. This article also considers the employment laws of Hong Kong (both wrongful dismissal under s 7 and unfair dismissal under Part VIA of the Employment Ordinance) as a point of comparison with Australian developments. © LexisNexis, 2008.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-217
JournalAsia Pacific Law Review
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remedies for employment termination in Australia: A case of one door closing and another opening?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this