Abstract
China’s national carbon emissions trading scheme (NCETS) faces persistent challenges in generating a price signal capable of mobilizing large-scale decarbonization investment. Existing scholarship’s emphasis on technical rule design has limited its ability to explain this underperformance, leading scholars to conflate early-stage capacity constraints with structural limitations and to overlook interactions among central government agencies. This article situates the NCETS within China’s environmental governance framework and examines the institutions that shape decision-making, the structure of their interactions, and how this governance configuration weakens the NCETS’s capacity to generate incentives for low-carbon investment. It argues that fragmented authoritarianism has displaced both environmental authoritarianism and environmental federalism in Chinese emissions trading regulation and practice. The opaque, stakeholder-driven decision-making process embedded in the legal framework, together with asymmetries in bargaining power and divergent departmental interests, deprioritizes allowance scarcity and regulatory stability, thereby reducing investment incentives under the NCETS. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Law |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Online published - 17 Jul 2026 |
Funding
None declared.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Research Keywords
- environmental governance
- fragmented authoritarianism
- regulatory uncertainty
- China
- emissions trading
- decarbonization investment
Publisher's Copyright Statement
- This full text is made available under CC-BY-NC 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Regulatory Uncertainty under Fragmented Authoritarianism: decarbonization challenges in China’s national emissions trading scheme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver