TY - CHAP
T1 - Regulatory compliance
T2 - Organizational capacities and regulatory strategies for environmental protection
AU - Lynch-Wood, Gary
AU - Williamson, David
N1 - Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].
PY - 2010/1/1
Y1 - 2010/1/1
N2 - Introduction In this chapter we argue that forms of regulation vary in their capacity to influence behaviour. This is because the receptive capacity to particular forms of regulation varies between different actors. As a consequence, the successful application of regulatory approaches will only be secured if they are correctly aligned to these receptive capacities. This is a critical issue, particularly as the focus within the literature on regulatory compliance has tended to be on the relative effectiveness of different regulatory strategies and tools, without considering in any depth this question of differential capacity to respond. In a sense, our argument constitutes an extension and elaboration of the idea of responsive regulation (Ayres and Braithwaite 1992; Grabosky, Chapter 4, this book): we argue, in effect, that regulators should be responsive not only to the conduct of those they seek to regulate but also to their capacities to comply and internalize different approaches. This has some important implications for regulatory strategies. To develop this argument and substantiate our claims, we focus on one specific substantive area, namely, environmental regulation directed at private sector businesses. This is, of course, an important area in its own right but we suggest that our argument has wider implications, including for the criminal justice arena, and we return to consider these in our conclusion. © Cambridge University Press 2010.
AB - Introduction In this chapter we argue that forms of regulation vary in their capacity to influence behaviour. This is because the receptive capacity to particular forms of regulation varies between different actors. As a consequence, the successful application of regulatory approaches will only be secured if they are correctly aligned to these receptive capacities. This is a critical issue, particularly as the focus within the literature on regulatory compliance has tended to be on the relative effectiveness of different regulatory strategies and tools, without considering in any depth this question of differential capacity to respond. In a sense, our argument constitutes an extension and elaboration of the idea of responsive regulation (Ayres and Braithwaite 1992; Grabosky, Chapter 4, this book): we argue, in effect, that regulators should be responsive not only to the conduct of those they seek to regulate but also to their capacities to comply and internalize different approaches. This has some important implications for regulatory strategies. To develop this argument and substantiate our claims, we focus on one specific substantive area, namely, environmental regulation directed at private sector businesses. This is, of course, an important area in its own right but we suggest that our argument has wider implications, including for the criminal justice arena, and we return to consider these in our conclusion. © Cambridge University Press 2010.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80855145911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-80855145911&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511760983.007
DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511760983.007
M3 - RGC 12 - Chapter in an edited book (Author)
SN - 9780511760983
SN - 9780521190701
SP - 134
EP - 161
BT - Regulation and Criminal Justice: Innovations in Policy and Research
PB - Cambridge University Press
ER -