Abstract
The Global Settlement, along with related regulations in the early 2000s, prohibits the use of investment banking revenue to fund equity research and compensate equity analysts. We find that all-star analysts from investment banks are more likely to exit the profession or move to the buy side after the regulations. The departed star analysts’ earnings revisions and stock recommendations are more informative than those of the remaining analysts who followed the same companies. To the extent that star analysts are superior to their non-star counterparts in terms of research ability and ability to inform the market, the exit of star analysts represents a brain drain in the sell-side equity research industry. These results are consistent with the view that the regulations introduced to protect equity investors have unintended adverse effects on the investors due to a brain drain in investment banks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5766–5784 |
| Journal | Management Science |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Online published | 3 Jul 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research Keywords
- analysts
- turnover
- brain drain
- the Global Settlement
- Sarbanes–Oxley Act
- policy and regulations
- investment banks
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Regulations and Brain Drain: Evidence from Wall Street Star Analysts' Career Choices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver