Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reflexivity in development assistance: the obstacles dual accountability and communicative asymmetry to achieving reflexive governance

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 22 - Publication in policy or professional journal

Abstract

The concept of reflexivity has been brought forward as a key component of sustainability science and sustainability governance, being indispensable for sustainability as a process and a goal. The reflexive governance research field has started to produce some insight into what reflexivity could mean in practice when brought out from the hallowed halls of science into the messy arena of governance, but so far attention has been focused on First-World cases. This paper will explore how reflexive governance relates to the reflexivity concept, and how it can be applied within Official Development Assistance (ODA), especially in ODA evaluations. Two main obstacles to reflexive knowledge production in ODA are identified, being the duality of accountability in ODA and the resulting knowledge incentives, and the asymmetry in communicative capacity. Lastly recommendations are made to address these obstacles, so that evaluations can assist in achieving sustainable development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-27
JournalInternational Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Research Keywords

  • ODA
  • Reflexive governance
  • Reflexivity
  • Sustainable development

Policy Impact

  • Cited in Policy Documents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflexivity in development assistance: the obstacles dual accountability and communicative asymmetry to achieving reflexive governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this