Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reduction of Particulate Matter and Ammonia by Spraying Acidic Electrolyzed Water onto Litter of Aviary Hen Houses: A Lab-scale Study

Lilong Chai, Yang Zhao, Hongwei Xin*, Tong Wang, Atilgan Atilgan, Michelle Soupir, Kai Liu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication)peer-review

Abstract

Particulate matter (PM) concentrations are high in aviary hen houses due to accumulation of litter on the floor and hen activities on it. Spraying agent such as acidic electrolyzed water (AEW) to mitigate PM levels and disinfect houses has been reported, and higher spray dosage will reduce PM to a lower level. However, spraying higher dosage of AEW may generate higher levels of ammonia (NH3) due to increase in litter moisture content (LMC). Lab-scale experiments were conducted to assess the effect of AEW spray dosage and pH value on PM and NH3 emissions from litter of aviary hen houses. Three spray dosages of 25, 50, and 75 mL [kg dry litter]-1d-1 and three pH values of 3, 5, and 7 at a free-chlorine concentration of 200 mg L-1 were tested. Spraying was done within 10 min once a day for 5 consecutive days. A no-spray regimen was used as the control. Four dynamic emission chambers (DEC's) located in an environmentally-controlled room were used for the evaluation. The results showed that higher spray dosages of AEW led to lower PM emissions. Specially, spraying dosages of 25, 50, and 75 mL [kg dry litter]-1d-1 reduced PM levels by (mean±SD) 71±3%, 81±1%, and 89±1%, respectively, immediately after spraying. The PM reductions were still significant after 24h of spraying, averaging 57±4%, 71±5%, and 83±1%, respectively. There was no significant difference (P=0.30-0.43) in reduction efficacy among the PM sizes (i.e., PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM10, and total suspended particulates). For NH3 emissions, spraying 75 mL [kg dry litter]-1d-1 generated 5-6 times NH3 emissions as compared to 25 mL [kg dry litter]-1 d-1 due to difference in LMC (22.6% vs. 13.0%). Meanwhile, spraying AEW with pH7 yielded 2-3 times higher NH3 emissions than AEW with pH3 at the same dosage. Ammonia emissions of all the spray treatments were found to be higher than those of the control, albeit no significant difference between control and the 25 mL [kg dry litter]-1d-1 dosage at pH3 and pH5 (P=0.81, P=0.47). Pearson correlation coefficients between NH3 and spray dosage (0.82) and pH value (0.46) indicated that the spray dosage is more linearly correlated to NH3 emissions than pH value (P<0.05). The results suggest that use of 25 mL [kg dry litter]-1d-1 dosage at a pH3 seems to be a prudent combination to control PM levels without causing the undesired elevation in NH3 emissions in the litter-based aviary hen houses. This lab-based finding provides the basis for the future field verification test.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting
Place of PublicationSt. Joseph, Michigan
PublisherAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
ISBN (Print)9781510828759
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes
Event2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting - Orlando, United States
Duration: 17 Jul 201620 Jul 2016
https://www.asabe.org/Events/2016-Annual-International-Meeting

Publication series

NameASABE Annual International Meeting
PublisherAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers

Conference

Conference2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting
PlaceUnited States
CityOrlando
Period17/07/1620/07/16
Internet address

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Keywords

  • Air quality
  • Alternative hen housing
  • Animal and worker health
  • Laying hen

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reduction of Particulate Matter and Ammonia by Spraying Acidic Electrolyzed Water onto Litter of Aviary Hen Houses: A Lab-scale Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this