Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from closed activated sludge- to aerobic granular sludge-based biosystems via gas circulation
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 130748 |
Journal / Publication | Bioresource Technology |
Volume | 401 |
Online published | 26 Apr 2024 |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2024 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from biological treatment units are challenging wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) due to their wide applications and global warming. This study aimed to reduce GHG emissions (especially N2O) using a gas circulation strategy in a closed sequencing-batch reactor when the biological unit varies from activated sludge (AS) to aerobic granular sludge (AGS). Results show that gas circulation lowers pH to 6.3 ± 0.2, facilitating regular granules but elevating total N2O production. From AS to AGS, N2O emission factor increased (0.07–0.86 %) due to decreasing ammonia-oxidizing rates while the emissions of CO2 (0.3 ± 0.1 kg-CO2/kg-chemical oxygen demand) and CH4 remained in the closed biosystem. The gas circulation decreased N2O emission factor by 63 ± 15 % after granulation higher than 44 ± 34 % before granulation, which is implemented by heterotrophic denitrification. This study provides a feasible strategy to enhance heterotrophic N2O elimination in the biological WWTPs. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
Research Area(s)
- Carbon dioxide, Granulation, Mitigation strategy, Nitrous oxide, Wastewater treatment
Citation Format(s)
Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from closed activated sludge- to aerobic granular sludge-based biosystems via gas circulation. / Wang, Jixiang; Li, Zejiao; Xiong, Pengyu et al.
In: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 401, 130748, 06.2024.
In: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 401, 130748, 06.2024.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review