Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reconsidering Septic Tanks

  • Tibo Roelants
  • , Min Zheng
  • , Bart Saerens
  • , Myrthe Van Hal
  • , Mark C. M. van Loosdrecht
  • , Zhiguo Yuan
  • , Eveline I. P. Volcke*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

Septic tanks remain widely used as decentralized sanitation systems, yet their environmental implications are often underestimated. This perspective reassesses their role regarding three main aspects. First, the traditional advantages of septic tanks are highly context-specific. While they provide effective solid retention and promote partial carbon breakdown under anaerobic conditions, these benefits are most relevant in the absence of sewer infrastructure. When connected to the sewer system, their use provides limited benefit and may introduce unintended system-level drawbacks. Moreover, the removal of biodegradable carbon in septic tanks lowers the biochemical oxygen demand over nitrogen (BOD/N) ratio entering centralized wastewater treatment plants, increasing the need for external carbon dosing for denitrification and adding substantial financial and indirect greenhouse gas burdens. Furthermore, septic tanks are a significant source of methane. Measured emissions are of similar or even greater magnitude than those from centralized wastewater treatment and represent non-negligible shares of city- and country-scale greenhouse gas inventories. Overall, it is concluded that septic tanks warrant reconsideration when connected to a sewer. Improved inventories, refined emission models, and an evaluation of sewer methane dynamics are necessary to inform future management strategies and to determine when septic tanks should be phased out or better kept in operation. © 2026 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1741–1753
Number of pages13
JournalACS ES&T Engineering
Volume6
Issue number6
Online published26 May 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2026

Funding

Z.Y. is a Global STEM Professor jointly funded by the Innovation, Technology and Industry Bureau (“ITIB”) and Education Bureau (“EDB”) of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and acknowledges the financial support by The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust’s for the JC STEM Lab of Sustainable Urban Water Management. M.Z. gratefully acknowledges support from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) through Grant No. V505624N for a scientific stay in Flanders, enabling his research visit to Ghent University. The authors thank Ana Molina Romero for assistance with the preparation of Figure 5 during her master thesis research at Ghent University. The authors note the use of AI scientific literature search engines (Elicit and SciSpace) and spelling checks (ChatGPT and Copilot) during the preparation of this manuscript.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  2. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Research Keywords

  • black water
  • greenhousegas emissions
  • methane
  • sewer systems
  • wastewater treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconsidering Septic Tanks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this