Abstract
In Mumbai, recurrent controversies over public space seem to present anotherexample of the global relevance of the ‘end of public space’ thesis. According to thisdystopian thesis, neo-liberalism and global capital enable private developers to replace openand diverse public spaces by comfortable, safe and profitable pseudo-public consumptionspaces. Pushing out marginalized groups and political activities, this culminates in a crisis ofcommunity, solidarity and democracy. However, the Bandra Waterfront controversy suggestsanother story. Employing the Actor-Network-Theory, we show that successful reclamation ofpublic space by middle-class civil activists here directly relates to the construction of a publicincluding new forms of social discipline over marginalized groups. We conclude that publicspace always implies exclusion and control; and that the actors of exclusion vary betweenplaces. Urban studies research should move beyond general storylines, towards preciseempirical research of such local urban transformation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Presented - 27 Oct 2011 |
| Event | International Research Conference on Planning/Conflict: Critical Perspectives on Contentious Urban Developments - Berlin, Germany Duration: 27 Oct 2011 → 28 Oct 2011 |
Conference
| Conference | International Research Conference on Planning/Conflict: Critical Perspectives on Contentious Urban Developments |
|---|---|
| Place | Germany |
| City | Berlin |
| Period | 27/10/11 → 28/10/11 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reclaiming Public Space in Mumbai: The Bandra Waterfront Controversy and the Constitution of the Public'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver