Reciprocity in Corporate Tax Compliance—Evidence from Ozone Pollution
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1425-1477 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of Accounting Research |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 5 |
Online published | 26 Jul 2023 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Link(s)
Abstract
In a tax—public goods reciprocity framework between citizens and the state, managers view taxes as a payment to the government in exchange for public goods, and hence they adjust their willingness to pay taxes as public good quality changes. We show that corporate tax planning intensity increases with ground-level ozone pollution. Revisions in ozone pollution regulations cause counties that failed the revised and more stringent standards to reduce ozone pollution. Consequently, firms headquartered in these counties reduced corporate tax planning intensity relative to firms in other counties. The ozone-tax link varies in the predicted directions with public attention to pollution, potential welfare loss due to ozone, managers’ stakeholder orientation, taxpayers’ polluting status, political preferences, and civic norms. We also find consistent results for Superfund cleanups of hazardous waste sites. Our research sheds light on reciprocity as a potential mechanism influencing corporate tax compliance. © 2023 The Chookaszian Accounting Research Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
Research Area(s)
- corporate tax, pollution, public goods, reciprocity, tax morale
Citation Format(s)
Reciprocity in Corporate Tax Compliance—Evidence from Ozone Pollution. / CHOW, Travis; FAN, Zhongwen; HUANG, Li et al.
In: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 61, No. 5, 12.2023, p. 1425-1477.
In: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 61, No. 5, 12.2023, p. 1425-1477.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review