Rechtsvergleichung ist kein Hobby: Das Beispiel des „anticipatory breach“in Belgien

André J. Janssen

doi:10.54648/erpl2021043

Rechtsvergleichung ist kein Hobby: Das Beispiel des „anticipatory breach“in Belgien

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Original language	German
Pages (from-to)	831-834
Journal	European Review of Private Law
Volume	29
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2021043
Publication status	Published - Dec 2021
Externally published	Yes

Access Output

10.54648/erpl2021043

Other Access Options

Check CityUHK Library

Permanent Link

Right click to copy link

Cite this

@article{4a022681764240219f9862da708bd9f7,

title = "Rechtsvergleichung ist kein Hobby: Das Beispiel des „anticipatory breach“in Belgien",

author = "Janssen, {Andr{\'e} J.}",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

doi = "10.54648/erpl2021043",

language = "German",

volume = "29",

pages = "831--834",

journal = "European Review of Private Law",

issn = "0928-9801",

publisher = "Kluwer Law International",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rechtsvergleichung ist kein Hobby

T2 - Das Beispiel des „anticipatory breach“in Belgien

AU - Janssen, André J.

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127926039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127926039&origin=recordpage

U2 - 10.54648/erpl2021043

DO - 10.54648/erpl2021043

M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal

SN - 0928-9801

VL - 29

SP - 831

EP - 834

JO - European Review of Private Law

JF - European Review of Private Law

IS - 6

ER -

Rechtsvergleichung ist kein Hobby: Das Beispiel des „anticipatory breach“in Belgien

Access Output

Other Access Options

Permanent Link

Other Files and Links

Cite this