Abstract
Market makers choose and design market rules to serve certain objectives, such as to maximize revenue from the sales in the case of a single seller and multiple buyers. Given such rules, market participants play against each other to maximize their utility function values on goods acquired, possibly by hiding or misrepresenting their information needed in the implementation of market rules. Today’s Internet economy has changed the information collection process and may make some of the assumptions of market rule implementation obsolete. Here we make a fresh review of works on this challenge on the Internet where new economic systems operate. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 231-260 |
| Journal | 4OR |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Funding
This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61632017, 61761146005, 71771161, 71471091). Dominik Scheder acknowledges support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61502300.
Research Keywords
- Algorithmic Game Theory
- Auction
- Incentive Ratio
- Market equilibrium
- Nash Equilibrium
- Truthfulness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Recent studies of agent incentives in internet resource allocation and pricing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver