Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rawls' theory of justice: A naturalistic evaluation

    Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 62 - Review of books or of software (or similar publications/items) › peer-review

    Abstract

    This article critically evaluates John Rawls' theory of justice from a naturalistic perspective. The naturalistic approach is increasingly advocated in contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of logic. Recently this approach has also become more influential in the study of ethics. Based on an experimental study on social justice conducted in Hong Kong, Beijing, and Taipei, this article argues that although Rawls' theory of justice has a naturalistic flavor, it has difficulty in standing up against the scrutiny of empirical tests if he commits himself to a fully fledged naturalistic approach. Copyright © Taylor & Francis, Inc.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)449-465
    JournalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy
    Volume30
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2005

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
    2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

    Research Keywords

    • Chinese conception of social justice
    • Naturalism
    • Rawls' Theory of Justice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rawls' theory of justice: A naturalistic evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this