Abstract
This article critically evaluates John Rawls' theory of justice from a naturalistic perspective. The naturalistic approach is increasingly advocated in contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of logic. Recently this approach has also become more influential in the study of ethics. Based on an experimental study on social justice conducted in Hong Kong, Beijing, and Taipei, this article argues that although Rawls' theory of justice has a naturalistic flavor, it has difficulty in standing up against the scrutiny of empirical tests if he commits himself to a fully fledged naturalistic approach. Copyright © Taylor & Francis, Inc.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 449-465 |
| Journal | Journal of Medicine and Philosophy |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research Keywords
- Chinese conception of social justice
- Naturalism
- Rawls' Theory of Justice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rawls' theory of justice: A naturalistic evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver