Rawls' theory of justice : A naturalistic evaluation

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)62_Review of books or of software (or similar publications/items)peer-review

7 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-465
Journal / PublicationJournal of Medicine and Philosophy
Volume30
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2005

Abstract

This article critically evaluates John Rawls' theory of justice from a naturalistic perspective. The naturalistic approach is increasingly advocated in contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of logic. Recently this approach has also become more influential in the study of ethics. Based on an experimental study on social justice conducted in Hong Kong, Beijing, and Taipei, this article argues that although Rawls' theory of justice has a naturalistic flavor, it has difficulty in standing up against the scrutiny of empirical tests if he commits himself to a fully fledged naturalistic approach. Copyright © Taylor & Francis, Inc.

Research Area(s)

  • Chinese conception of social justice, Naturalism, Rawls' Theory of Justice