Abstract
The rational planning cycle of formulating strategic goals and using performance information to assess goal implementation is assumed to assist decision-making by politicians. Empirical evidence supporting this assumption is scarce. Our study replicates a Danish experiment on the relation between performance information and politicians‘ preferences for spending and reform and extends this experiment by investigating the role of strategic goals. Based on a randomized survey experiment (1.484 Flemish city councillors) and an analysis of 225 strategic plans, we found that information on low and high performance as well as strategic goals impact politicians’ preferences for spending and reform.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1251-1271 |
| Journal | Public Management Review |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Oct 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Research Keywords
- decision-making
- performance measurement
- Rational planning
- strategic planning
- survey experiment
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rational planning and politicians’ preferences for spending and reform: replication and extension of a survey experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver