Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Questions for Hierarchical Confucianism

Elena Ziliotti*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Through a new argumentative strategy, this article shows that the claims offered by some contemporary Confucian scholars in support of hierarchical social relations do not hold in contemporary societies. Exegetical disagreements that are arguably difficult to overcome are sidestepped and empirical claims in support of hierarchical Confucianism are assessed. Empirical evidence and recent developments in Western philosophy suggest that social hierarchies are detrimental to key factors for people's material well-being, ethical development, and the political order. Egalitarian social relations organized in a representative democratic system appear to be more suitable for the pursuit of the fundamental aims of a Confucian government which are accepted by the proponents of hierarchical Confucianism. © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Notre Dame.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-349
Number of pages21
JournalThe Review of Politics
Volume84
Issue number3
Online published6 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Questions for Hierarchical Confucianism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this