Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantitative Analysis of Heart Age Metrics: A Multi-Standard Assessment in the UK Biobank Cohort

Zheng Gong, Emerald Sy, Rosa H. M. Chan*, Kannie W. Y. Chan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication)peer-review

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) stands as the leading global cause of illness, death, and financial burden in healthcare. Aging, an unavoidable and natural process, contributes to the development of CVD through physiological changes such as arterial stiffening and vascular dysfunction, making it a critical factor in assessing cardiovascular health. Consequently, heart age estimating the biological age of the cardiovascular system based on risk factors, has emerged as a valuable tool for identifying individuals at elevated risk and communicating cardiovascular health in a relatable way. In this paper, we discuss the mechanisms of human aging related to CVD, and assess how well previously established heart age metrics align with chronological age using a more current database. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study systematically comparing different definitions and corresponding results of heart age, and analyzing the parameters required for these definitions using a subset of the UK Biobank database (n=387,574) to compare heart age differences under widely adopted standards, including the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE). Our analysis examines heart age distributions by sex, age group, and other parameters to assess their relationship with chronological age. The results indicate that there are noticeable differences in the definitions of heart age, with calculated heart age averaging 11% higher than their chronological age based on the previously established definitions. These findings highlight the need to revisit and refine heart age metrics to enhance their utility in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk assessment as lifestyle and environmental risk factors evolve. © 2025 IEEE.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2025 47th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) - Proceedings
PublisherIEEE
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9798331586188
ISBN (Print)9798331586195
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Event47th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2025) - Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
Duration: 14 Jul 202517 Jul 2025
https://embc.embs.org/2025/

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS
ISSN (Print)2375-7477
ISSN (Electronic)2694-0604

Conference

Conference47th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2025)
Abbreviated titleIEEE EMBC 2025
PlaceDenmark
CityCopenhagen
Period14/07/2517/07/25
Internet address

Funding

Authors would like to acknowledge the funding supports from Innovation and Technology Commission - InnoHK - Hong Kong Centre for Cerebrocardiovascular Health Engineering; Research Grants Council (11102218, 11200422, RFS2223-1S02, C1134-20G), HMRF (21222621), City University of Hong Kong (7005626, 7006091, 7030012, 9229504, 9609321 and 9610616), Tung Biomedical Sciences Centre, State Key Laboratory of Terahertz and Millimeter Waves, MHKJS (MHP/076/23). This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 102307.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Keywords

  • biological age
  • cardiovascular disease
  • chronological age
  • data analysis
  • Heart age

RGC Funding Information

  • RGC-funded

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative Analysis of Heart Age Metrics: A Multi-Standard Assessment in the UK Biobank Cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this