TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of Baseline Schedules
T2 - Lessons from Higher Education Capital Facility Projects
AU - Han, Seungheon
AU - Choi, Jin Ouk
AU - O'Connor, James T.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - The keys to capital facility project success are developing a sound project plan or schedule and then carrying out the project according to the plan. The construction industry, however, has major difficulties accomplishing schedule goals, and construction professionals struggle to develop reasonable baseline schedules. The objective of this paper is, by applying the industry-recognized schedule quality metrics to baseline schedules used for higher-education capital facility projects at the University of Texas at Austin, to understand the current quality of baseline schedule, identify problems, and provide recommendations for future higher-education capital facility projects. The evaluation results show that among 49 collected industry-recognized metrics, all the projects passed 27 metrics, with one project failing to pass all of the remaining 22 of the 49 metrics. The industry should pay particular attention to the following commonly occurring issues when developing a baseline schedule: (1) dividing up activities that exceed 30 working days; (2) creating or managing a schedule containing multiple lags; (3) initially using unique task names; (4) assigning at least one predecessor and successor to an activity or a milestone; and (5) developing a schedule mainly through a Finish to Start relationship.
AB - The keys to capital facility project success are developing a sound project plan or schedule and then carrying out the project according to the plan. The construction industry, however, has major difficulties accomplishing schedule goals, and construction professionals struggle to develop reasonable baseline schedules. The objective of this paper is, by applying the industry-recognized schedule quality metrics to baseline schedules used for higher-education capital facility projects at the University of Texas at Austin, to understand the current quality of baseline schedule, identify problems, and provide recommendations for future higher-education capital facility projects. The evaluation results show that among 49 collected industry-recognized metrics, all the projects passed 27 metrics, with one project failing to pass all of the remaining 22 of the 49 metrics. The industry should pay particular attention to the following commonly occurring issues when developing a baseline schedule: (1) dividing up activities that exceed 30 working days; (2) creating or managing a schedule containing multiple lags; (3) initially using unique task names; (4) assigning at least one predecessor and successor to an activity or a milestone; and (5) developing a schedule mainly through a Finish to Start relationship.
KW - Baseline schedule
KW - Higher-education capital facility projects
KW - Schedule quality metrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009074662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85009074662&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000302
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000302
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1052-3928
VL - 143
JO - Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
JF - Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
IS - 1
M1 - 4016017
ER -