Abstract
This study investigates quality investment timing decisions of the established firm and the startup by a duopoly model, where firms can position quality early (demand uncertainty is high) or late (uncertainty has been resolved), possibly at different costs. The startup positions quality to maximize its survival probability, whereas the established firm maximizes profits. Results indicate that the startup positions quality earlier than the established firm when the demand uncertainty is high and costs do not decline sharply over time. Additionally, policy analysis shows that subsidies work better than direct funds in encouraging quality innovation of the startup.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 275-284 |
| Journal | Managerial and Decision Economics |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Online published | 27 Oct 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quality investment timing by the startup and the established firm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver