Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Putting the cart before the horse: Accountability or performance?

  • Hon S. Chan
  • , Jie Gao

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Conventional wisdom argues that a good set of performance measures builds accountability and that improved accountability generates better productivity in the organisation. By way of an analysis of a case study in one inland Chinese county, this article shows that the assumed relationship between performance and accountability is more rhetoric than real. In practice, the implementation of performance measurement in local China leads to an accountability paradox, in which enhanced accountability tends to hinder the improvement of government productivity. The implementation of the Chinese target-based responsibility system risks boosting the short term accountability of public employees while undermining the long term productivity of government agencies. With the deepening of China's market-oriented reform, this choice appears to put the cart before the horse. © 2009 National Council of the Institute of Public Administration Australia.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume68
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Research Keywords

  • Accountability
  • China
  • Performance measurement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Putting the cart before the horse: Accountability or performance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this