Principles of canonical action research

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalNot applicablepeer-review

348 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-86
Journal / PublicationInformation Systems Journal
Volume14
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Abstract

Despite the growing prominence of canonical action research (CAR) in the information systems discipline, a paucity of methodological guidance continues to hamper those conducting and evaluating such studies. This article elicits a set of five principles and associated criteria to help assure both the rigor and the relevance of CAR in information systems. The first principle relates to the development of an agreement that facilitates collaboration between the action researcher and the client. The second principle is based upon a cyclical process model for action research that consists of five stages: diagnosis, planning, intervention, evaluation and reflection. Additional principles highlight the critical roles of theory, change through action, and the specification of learning in terms of implications for both research and practice. The five principles are illustrated through the analysis of one recently published CAR study.

Research Area(s)

  • Canonical action research, Interpretivism, Meta-analysis, Organizational change, Organizational learning, Research frameworks

Citation Format(s)

Principles of canonical action research. / Davison, Robert M.; Martinsons, Maris G.; Kock, Ned.

In: Information Systems Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 65-86.

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalNot applicablepeer-review