Private Compensation and Organizational Design
Research output: Conference Papers (RGC: 31A, 31B, 32, 33) › 32_Refereed conference paper (without host publication) › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 26 Aug 2021 |
Conference
Title | The 48th Annual Meeting of the European Finance Association |
---|---|
Location | Virtual from Milan |
Place | Italy |
Period | 25 - 27 August 2021 |
Link(s)
Document Link | |
---|---|
Permanent Link | https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(df54229c-a9bb-42fc-a5c3-d4fe33b3aea6).html |
Abstract
Most of the literature on organizational design and incentives assumes public contracting. Yet
most real world compensation contracts are private information, observed only by their direct
signatories. This matters when agents work together to produce a joint output, because they
care about each others’ incentives. In this case, the principal can gain from designating one agent
“team leader,” with authority to decide, and hence observe, all the bonuses. Such “outsourcing”
of contracting is never optimal with fully public contracts. With private contracts, by contrast,
it raises effort by reassuring agents that the incentives provided are sufficiently strong; but it
distorts effort allocation, as the team leader takes too much of the compensation budget. Even
when observability is held constant, pay delegation can raise output by skewing bonuses towards
more productive agents.
Bibliographic Note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.
Citation Format(s)
Private Compensation and Organizational Design. / BUFFA, Andrea M.; LIU, Qing; WHITE, Lucy.
2021. Paper presented at The 48th Annual Meeting of the European Finance Association, Italy.
2021. Paper presented at The 48th Annual Meeting of the European Finance Association, Italy.
Research output: Conference Papers (RGC: 31A, 31B, 32, 33) › 32_Refereed conference paper (without host publication) › peer-review