Long-term care: Dignity, autonomy, family integrity, and social sustainability : The Hong Kong experience
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 401-424 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of Medicine and Philosophy |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 5 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2007 |
Link(s)
Abstract
This article reveals the outcome of a study on the perceptions of elders, family members, and healthcare professionals and administration providing care in a range of different long-term care facilities in Hong Kong with primary focus on the concepts of autonomy and dignity of elders, quality and location of care, decision making, and financing of long term care. It was found that aging in place and family care were considered the best approaches to long term care insofar as procuring and balancing the values of dignity, autonomy, family integrity and social sustainability were concerned. An elder having the final say was generally accepted. The results also initiated the importance of sharing of financial responsibility among elders, children and government albeit the emphasis was placed on individuals. Furthermore, dignity of elders was not considered purely a synonym of autonomy, but it had also to do with respect, family and social connections. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Research Area(s)
- Autonomy, Dignity, Family care, Individual responsibility
Citation Format(s)
Long-term care: Dignity, autonomy, family integrity, and social sustainability: The Hong Kong experience. / Chan, Ho Mun; Pang, Sam.
In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 32, No. 5, 09.2007, p. 401-424.
In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 32, No. 5, 09.2007, p. 401-424.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review