Phase I IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark problem using simulated data
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-15 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of Engineering Mechanics |
Volume | 130 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2004 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a promising field with widespread application in civil engineering. Structural health monitoring has the potential to make structures safer by observing both long-term structural changes and immediate postdisaster damage. However, the many SHM studies in the literature apply different monitoring methods to different structures, making side-by-side comparison of the methods difficult. This paper details the first phase in a benchmark SHM problem organized under the auspices of the IASC-ASCE Structural Health Monitoring Task Group. The scale-model structure adopted for use in this benchmark problem is described. Then, two analytical models based on the structure-one a 12 degree of freedom (DOF) shear-building model, the other a 120-DOF model, both finite element based-are given. The damage patterns to be identified are listed as well as the types and number of sensors, magnitude of sensor noise, and so forth. MATLAB computer codes to generate the response data for the various cases are explained. The codes, as well as details of the ongoing Task Group activities, are available on the Task Group web site at .
Research Area(s)
- Bench marks, Damage assessment, Data analysis, Seismic response, Structural safety
Citation Format(s)
Phase I IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark problem using simulated data. / Johnson, E. A.; Lam, H. F.; Katafygiotis, L. S. et al.
In: Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 130, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 3-15.
In: Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 130, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 3-15.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review