Financial statement frauds and auditor sanctions : An analysis of enforcement actions in China

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

58 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations



Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-381
Journal / PublicationJournal of Business Ethics
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes


The rising tide of corporate scandals and audit failures has shocked the public, and the integrity of auditors is being increasingly questioned. It is crucial for auditors and regulators to understand the main causes of audit failure and devise preventive measures accordingly. This study analyzes enforcement actions issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission against auditors in respect of fraudulent financial reporting committed by listed companies in China. We find that auditors are more likely to be sanctioned by the regulators for failing to detect and report material misstatement frauds rather than disclosure frauds. Further analysis of the material misstatements indicates that auditors are more likely to be sanctioned for failing to detect and report revenue-related frauds rather than assets-related frauds. In sum, our results suggest that regulators believe auditors have the responsibility to detect and report frauds that are egregious, transaction-based, and related to accounting earnings. The results contribute to our knowledge of auditors' responsibilities for detecting frauds as perceived by regulators. © Springer 2005.

Research Area(s)

  • Audit failure, Audit quality, Auditor responsibility, Auditor sanction, Fraud type