Research rankings of Asia Pacific business schools : Global versus local knowledge strategies
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 171-188 |
| Journal / Publication | Asia Pacific Journal of Management |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
Despite the increasing recognition of the importance of the research mission of universities, no previous work has investigated the research productivity and research strategies of Asia Pacific business schools. This article fills this important gap by conducting the first study to rank the publication productivity of 130 Asia Pacific business schools. Drawing on data from the UTD Top 100 Business School Research Rankings™ and several additional sources, we rank Asia Pacific business schools' research productivity in three areas: (1) twenty-four leading business journals, (2) seven top management journals, and (3) five Asia Pacific management journals. We also extend this analysis by documenting the distinct publishing strategies of various Asia Pacific business schools-global, local, or both. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Research Area(s)
- Asian Pacific business schools, Productivity, Rankings, Research
Citation Format(s)
Research rankings of Asia Pacific business schools : Global versus local knowledge strategies. / Mudambi, Ram; Peng, Mike W.; Weng, David H.
In: Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 171-188.Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
