How do decision stakes affect omission bias?
Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works (RGC: 12, 32, 41, 45) › 32_Refereed conference paper (with ISBN/ISSN) › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017 |
| Publisher | Academy of Management |
| Volume | 2017-August |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
| Name | 2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017 |
|---|---|
| Volume | 2017-August |
Conference
| Title | 77th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017 |
|---|---|
| Place | United States |
| City | Atlanta |
| Period | 4 - 8 August 2017 |
Link(s)
Abstract
People prefer harms caused by omission to equal or lesser harms caused by action, a tendency known as omission bias. Several studies, however, have challenged the existence of this bias. In this paper, we study how decision stakes affect people’s propensity to show omission bias.
Bibliographic Note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to lbscholars@cityu.edu.hk.
Citation Format(s)
How do decision stakes affect omission bias? / Park, Kyeonggook Francis; Boyle, Elizabeth; Shapira, Zur.
2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017. Vol. 2017-August Academy of Management, 2017. (2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2017; Vol. 2017-August).Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works (RGC: 12, 32, 41, 45) › 32_Refereed conference paper (with ISBN/ISSN) › peer-review
