Does analysts coverage curb executives’ excess perks? Evidence from Chinese listed firms
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 329-343 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal / Publication | Asia - Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 2 |
Online published | 1 Jun 2020 |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Link(s)
Abstract
In this study, we explore the causal relationship between analyst coverage and executives’ excess perquisites by using manually collected data from Chinese listed firms. Empirical results show that analyst following has a negative effect on excess perks. This result still holds when we use alternative measure of excess perquisites, utilize alternative regression methodology, and address endogenous problems. Furthermore, we find that the analysts’ monitoring effect is more pronounced when corruption is more severe. Finally, we find that the effect substitutes the monitoring function by large shareholders and Big 4 auditors.
Research Area(s)
- analyst coverage, excess perks, Big 4 auditors, corruption, large shareholders
Citation Format(s)
Does analysts coverage curb executives’ excess perks? Evidence from Chinese listed firms. / Chen, Chong; Jiang, Dequan; Li, Weiping et al.
In: Asia - Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2022, p. 329-343.Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review