Human resource management strategies under uncertainty : How do US and Hong Kong Chinese companies differ?

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

13 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-186
Journal / PublicationCross Cultural Management: An International Journal
Volume13
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2006

Abstract

Purpose – To compare the tendency of US and Hong Kong Chinese companies to utilize three alternative human resource management (HRM) strategies to offset uncertainties in the supply of labor. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 158 US and 66 Hong Kong Chinese companies concerning the extent to which these companies engaged in training and development, monitoring and assessment of employee performance, and staffing through an internal labor market. Data were also obtained concerning the uncertainty in the supply of qualified employees. Findings – After controlling differences in industries and company size, the results show that, when faced with labor uncertainty, use of the three (HRM) strategies was increased by Hong Kong Chinese companies, but decreased by US companies. Practical implications – This study provides new information about how cultural differences may play out in business organizations. The results may provide some insight into how competitors in a global marketplace may react to environmental uncertainties and greater resource dependence. Originality/value – This study fills a need to understand how organizations operating different cultural contexts differ in their reactions to uncertainties in the business environment. © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Research Area(s)

  • Hong Kong, Human resource management, Labour market, Uncertainty management, United States of America

Citation Format(s)